Science vs Pseudoscience | Problems in Philosophy of Science

How do we determine whether a theory is scientific or not? What gives science the credibility and authority that it commands? In philosophy of science, this is called the demarcation problem: how do we demarcate between science & pseudoscience. Some philosophers believed if you could find confirmations of your theory, then it must be true. But, philosopher Karl Popper proposed a different method. Instead of trying to find more confirmations of our theories, we should be doing everything we can to FALSIFY OUR THEORIES, BIIIITCH!!!

Help out the channel by purchasing these books through the Amazon links below.

Sources:
Popper, Karl Raimund. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge, 2002. Buy here.

Einstein, Albert. Relativity, the Special and the General Theory: A Popular Exposition by Albert Einstein. Translated by Robert W. Lawson, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1961. Buy here.

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, Barnes & Noble, New York, NY, 2005. Buy here.

Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Patreon

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

RSS